Severity: 8192
Message: Return type of CI_Session_database_driver::open($save_path, $name) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::open(string $path, string $name): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Filename: drivers/Session_database_driver.php
Line Number: 126
Backtrace:
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once
Severity: 8192
Message: Return type of CI_Session_database_driver::close() should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::close(): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Filename: drivers/Session_database_driver.php
Line Number: 261
Backtrace:
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once
Severity: 8192
Message: Return type of CI_Session_database_driver::read($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::read(string $id): string|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Filename: drivers/Session_database_driver.php
Line Number: 143
Backtrace:
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once
Severity: 8192
Message: Return type of CI_Session_database_driver::write($session_id, $session_data) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::write(string $id, string $data): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Filename: drivers/Session_database_driver.php
Line Number: 193
Backtrace:
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once
Severity: 8192
Message: Return type of CI_Session_database_driver::destroy($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::destroy(string $id): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Filename: drivers/Session_database_driver.php
Line Number: 278
Backtrace:
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once
Severity: 8192
Message: Return type of CI_Session_database_driver::gc($maxlifetime) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::gc(int $max_lifetime): int|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Filename: drivers/Session_database_driver.php
Line Number: 306
Backtrace:
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once
Severity: Warning
Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent
Filename: Session/Session.php
Line Number: 281
Backtrace:
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once
Severity: Warning
Message: session_set_cookie_params(): Session cookie parameters cannot be changed after headers have already been sent
Filename: Session/Session.php
Line Number: 293
Backtrace:
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once
Severity: Warning
Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent
Filename: Session/Session.php
Line Number: 303
Backtrace:
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once
Severity: Warning
Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent
Filename: Session/Session.php
Line Number: 313
Backtrace:
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once
Severity: Warning
Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent
Filename: Session/Session.php
Line Number: 314
Backtrace:
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once
Severity: Warning
Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent
Filename: Session/Session.php
Line Number: 315
Backtrace:
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once
Severity: Warning
Message: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent
Filename: Session/Session.php
Line Number: 316
Backtrace:
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once
Severity: Warning
Message: session_set_save_handler(): Session save handler cannot be changed after headers have already been sent
Filename: Session/Session.php
Line Number: 107
Backtrace:
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once
Severity: Warning
Message: session_start(): Session cannot be started after headers have already been sent
Filename: Session/Session.php
Line Number: 140
Backtrace:
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/application/controllers/Blog.php
Line: 24
Function: __construct
File: /home/lawyrspk02/public_html/index.php
Line: 292
Function: require_once
Mobile: +92 321 3261348
S. 397 ---Sentence on an offender already sentenced for another offence---Scope---Courts ordinarily order concurrent running of sentences recorded against a convict in different cases tried by different courts irrespective of the fact whether such conviction has been maintained, enhanced or modified by the Appellate and/or Revisional Court.
PLD 2020 Lahore 523
---------------------------------------------------
Ss. 35 & 397---Sentence in case of conviction of several offences at one trial---Sentence on an offender already sentenced for another offence---Concurrent running of sentences---Scope--- Petitioner contended that sentences handed to him in two FIRs (one of them being the offshoot of the other) be ordered to run concurrently---Sessions Judge, at the time of decision of appeal, had not noticed that the petitioner was already serving sentence---Courts generally took generous view in the matter of sentences affecting deprivation of life or liberty of a person and unless some aggravating circumstances did not permit so, liberally exercised enabling power under Ss.35 & 397, Cr.P.C., respectively to order concurrent running of sentence in one trial and so also consolidation of earlier sentence while handing down sentence of imprisonment in a subsequent trial--- No exceptional circumstances, held, existed to reject prayer of the petitioner---Petition was allowed.
PLD 2020 Lahore 523
--------------------------------------------------
S. 397 ---Sentence on an offender already sentenced for another offence---Scope---Where a person undergoing a sentence of imprisonment is subsequently convicted and sentenced in another trial, his subsequent sentence would commence at the expiration of his previous sentence, however, Trial Court seized of the subsequent trial and appellate/revisional court in the appeal/revision arising therefrom is competent to direct that the subsequent sentence would run concurrently with the previous one.
PLD 2020 Lahore 523
--------------------------------------------------
Ss. 35 & 397 ---Sentence in case of conviction of several offences at one trial---Sentence on an offender already sentenced for another offence---Concurrent running of sentences---Scope--- Petitioner contended that sentences handed to him in two FIRs (one of them being the offshoot of the other) be ordered to run concurrently---Sessions Judge, at the time of decision of appeal, had not noticed that the petitioner was already serving sentence---Courts generally took generous view in the matter of sentences affecting deprivation of life or liberty of a person and unless some aggravating circumstances did not permit so, liberally exercised enabling power under Ss.35 & 397 , Cr.P.C., respectively to order concurrent running of sentence in one trial and so also consolidation of earlier sentence while handing down sentence of imprisonment in a subsequent trial--- No exceptional circumstances, held, existed to reject prayer of the petitioner---Petition was allowed.
PLD 2020 Lahore 523
S. 397 ---Sentence on an offender already sentenced for another offence---Scope---Courts ordinarily order concurrent running of sentences recorded against a convict in different cases tried by different courts irrespective of the fact whether such conviction has been maintained, enhanced or modified by the Appellate and/or Revisional Court.
PLD 2020 Lahore 523
---------------------------------------------------
Ss. 35 & 397---Sentence in case of conviction of several offences at one trial---Sentence on an offender already sentenced for another offence---Concurrent running of sentences---Scope--- Petitioner contended that sentences handed to him in two FIRs (one of them being the offshoot of the other) be ordered to run concurrently---Sessions Judge, at the time of decision of appeal, had not noticed that the petitioner was already serving sentence---Courts generally took generous view in the matter of sentences affecting deprivation of life or liberty of a person and unless some aggravating circumstances did not permit so, liberally exercised enabling power under Ss.35 & 397, Cr.P.C., respectively to order concurrent running of sentence in one trial and so also consolidation of earlier sentence while handing down sentence of imprisonment in a subsequent trial--- No exceptional circumstances, held, existed to reject prayer of the petitioner---Petition was allowed.
PLD 2020 Lahore 523
--------------------------------------------------
S. 397 ---Sentence on an offender already sentenced for another offence---Scope---Where a person undergoing a sentence of imprisonment is subsequently convicted and sentenced in another trial, his subsequent sentence would commence at the expiration of his previous sentence, however, Trial Court seized of the subsequent trial and appellate/revisional court in the appeal/revision arising therefrom is competent to direct that the subsequent sentence would run concurrently with the previous one.
PLD 2020 Lahore 523
--------------------------------------------------
Ss. 35 & 397 ---Sentence in case of conviction of several offences at one trial---Sentence on an offender already sentenced for another offence---Concurrent running of sentences---Scope--- Petitioner contended that sentences handed to him in two FIRs (one of them being the offshoot of the other) be ordered to run concurrently---Sessions Judge, at the time of decision of appeal, had not noticed that the petitioner was already serving sentence---Courts generally took generous view in the matter of sentences affecting deprivation of life or liberty of a person and unless some aggravating circumstances did not permit so, liberally exercised enabling power under Ss.35 & 397 , Cr.P.C., respectively to order concurrent running of sentence in one trial and so also consolidation of earlier sentence while handing down sentence of imprisonment in a subsequent trial--- No exceptional circumstances, held, existed to reject prayer of the petitioner---Petition was allowed.
PLD 2020 Lahore 523
S. 397 ---Sentence on an offender already sentenced for another offence---Scope---Courts ordinarily order concurrent running of sentences recorded against a convict in different cases tried by different courts irrespective of the fact whether such conviction has been maintained, enhanced or modified by the Appellate and/or Revisional Court.
PLD 2020 Lahore 523
---------------------------------------------------
Ss. 35 & 397---Sentence in case of conviction of several offences at one trial---Sentence on an offender already sentenced for another offence---Concurrent running of sentences---Scope--- Petitioner contended that sentences handed to him in two FIRs (one of them being the offshoot of the other) be ordered to run concurrently---Sessions Judge, at the time of decision of appeal, had not noticed that the petitioner was already serving sentence---Courts generally took generous view in the matter of sentences affecting deprivation of life or liberty of a person and unless some aggravating circumstances did not permit so, liberally exercised enabling power under Ss.35 & 397, Cr.P.C., respectively to order concurrent running of sentence in one trial and so also consolidation of earlier sentence while handing down sentence of imprisonment in a subsequent trial--- No exceptional circumstances, held, existed to reject prayer of the petitioner---Petition was allowed.
PLD 2020 Lahore 523
--------------------------------------------------
S. 397 ---Sentence on an offender already sentenced for another offence---Scope---Where a person undergoing a sentence of imprisonment is subsequently convicted and sentenced in another trial, his subsequent sentence would commence at the expiration of his previous sentence, however, Trial Court seized of the subsequent trial and appellate/revisional court in the appeal/revision arising therefrom is competent to direct that the subsequent sentence would run concurrently with the previous one.
PLD 2020 Lahore 523
--------------------------------------------------
Ss. 35 & 397 ---Sentence in case of conviction of several offences at one trial---Sentence on an offender already sentenced for another offence---Concurrent running of sentences---Scope--- Petitioner contended that sentences handed to him in two FIRs (one of them being the offshoot of the other) be ordered to run concurrently---Sessions Judge, at the time of decision of appeal, had not noticed that the petitioner was already serving sentence---Courts generally took generous view in the matter of sentences affecting deprivation of life or liberty of a person and unless some aggravating circumstances did not permit so, liberally exercised enabling power under Ss.35 & 397 , Cr.P.C., respectively to order concurrent running of sentence in one trial and so also consolidation of earlier sentence while handing down sentence of imprisonment in a subsequent trial--- No exceptional circumstances, held, existed to reject prayer of the petitioner---Petition was allowed.
PLD 2020 Lahore 523
S. 397 ---Sentence on an offender already sentenced for another offence---Scope---Courts ordinarily order concurrent running of sentences recorded against a convict in different cases tried by different courts irrespective of the fact whether such conviction has been maintained, enhanced or modified by the Appellate and/or Revisional Court.
PLD 2020 Lahore 523
---------------------------------------------------
Ss. 35 & 397---Sentence in case of conviction of several offences at one trial---Sentence on an offender already sentenced for another offence---Concurrent running of sentences---Scope--- Petitioner contended that sentences handed to him in two FIRs (one of them being the offshoot of the other) be ordered to run concurrently---Sessions Judge, at the time of decision of appeal, had not noticed that the petitioner was already serving sentence---Courts generally took generous view in the matter of sentences affecting deprivation of life or liberty of a person and unless some aggravating circumstances did not permit so, liberally exercised enabling power under Ss.35 & 397, Cr.P.C., respectively to order concurrent running of sentence in one trial and so also consolidation of earlier sentence while handing down sentence of imprisonment in a subsequent trial--- No exceptional circumstances, held, existed to reject prayer of the petitioner---Petition was allowed.
PLD 2020 Lahore 523
--------------------------------------------------
S. 397 ---Sentence on an offender already sentenced for another offence---Scope---Where a person undergoing a sentence of imprisonment is subsequently convicted and sentenced in another trial, his subsequent sentence would commence at the expiration of his previous sentence, however, Trial Court seized of the subsequent trial and appellate/revisional court in the appeal/revision arising therefrom is competent to direct that the subsequent sentence would run concurrently with the previous one.
PLD 2020 Lahore 523
--------------------------------------------------
Ss. 35 & 397 ---Sentence in case of conviction of several offences at one trial---Sentence on an offender already sentenced for another offence---Concurrent running of sentences---Scope--- Petitioner contended that sentences handed to him in two FIRs (one of them being the offshoot of the other) be ordered to run concurrently---Sessions Judge, at the time of decision of appeal, had not noticed that the petitioner was already serving sentence---Courts generally took generous view in the matter of sentences affecting deprivation of life or liberty of a person and unless some aggravating circumstances did not permit so, liberally exercised enabling power under Ss.35 & 397 , Cr.P.C., respectively to order concurrent running of sentence in one trial and so also consolidation of earlier sentence while handing down sentence of imprisonment in a subsequent trial--- No exceptional circumstances, held, existed to reject prayer of the petitioner---Petition was allowed.
PLD 2020 Lahore 523
S. 397 ---Sentence on an offender already sentenced for another offence---Scope---Courts ordinarily order concurrent running of sentences recorded against a convict in different cases tried by different courts irrespective of the fact whether such conviction has been maintained, enhanced or modified by the Appellate and/or Revisional Court.
PLD 2020 Lahore 523
---------------------------------------------------
Ss. 35 & 397---Sentence in case of conviction of several offences at one trial---Sentence on an offender already sentenced for another offence---Concurrent running of sentences---Scope--- Petitioner contended that sentences handed to him in two FIRs (one of them being the offshoot of the other) be ordered to run concurrently---Sessions Judge, at the time of decision of appeal, had not noticed that the petitioner was already serving sentence---Courts generally took generous view in the matter of sentences affecting deprivation of life or liberty of a person and unless some aggravating circumstances did not permit so, liberally exercised enabling power under Ss.35 & 397, Cr.P.C., respectively to order concurrent running of sentence in one trial and so also consolidation of earlier sentence while handing down sentence of imprisonment in a subsequent trial--- No exceptional circumstances, held, existed to reject prayer of the petitioner---Petition was allowed.
PLD 2020 Lahore 523
--------------------------------------------------
S. 397 ---Sentence on an offender already sentenced for another offence---Scope---Where a person undergoing a sentence of imprisonment is subsequently convicted and sentenced in another trial, his subsequent sentence would commence at the expiration of his previous sentence, however, Trial Court seized of the subsequent trial and appellate/revisional court in the appeal/revision arising therefrom is competent to direct that the subsequent sentence would run concurrently with the previous one.
PLD 2020 Lahore 523
--------------------------------------------------
Ss. 35 & 397 ---Sentence in case of conviction of several offences at one trial---Sentence on an offender already sentenced for another offence---Concurrent running of sentences---Scope--- Petitioner contended that sentences handed to him in two FIRs (one of them being the offshoot of the other) be ordered to run concurrently---Sessions Judge, at the time of decision of appeal, had not noticed that the petitioner was already serving sentence---Courts generally took generous view in the matter of sentences affecting deprivation of life or liberty of a person and unless some aggravating circumstances did not permit so, liberally exercised enabling power under Ss.35 & 397 , Cr.P.C., respectively to order concurrent running of sentence in one trial and so also consolidation of earlier sentence while handing down sentence of imprisonment in a subsequent trial--- No exceptional circumstances, held, existed to reject prayer of the petitioner---Petition was allowed.
PLD 2020 Lahore 523
Defence Saving Certificates Rules, 1966
Sentence in case of conviction of several offences at one trial-
2018 MLD 927 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
No department could be allowed to absorb any employee of another cadre
specific time constraint was set out in S.25 in which the power to issues notification by the Federal…
NO LIMITATION RUN AGAINST VOID ORDER
PLD 2019 SC 719